Strategies

Institutions should adopt equity-informed GenAI policies, require AI-use disclosure, and educate reviewers on World Englishes variation

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The dialogue's contributors converge on institutional actions: developing inclusive guidelines for linguistic variation, promoting critical GenAI literacy, and providing editing support, so that reviewers, editors and PhD supervisors do not treat divergence from dominant norms as error. Sender proposes that "institutions should be very clear that they have equity-informed artificial intelligence policies that will encourage writers and reviewers to just avoid the automatic standardisation of English", and that journals ask writers to declare the extent of AI use (an AID Statement). Reviewers using GenAI should be critically aware of World Englishes variation and provided resources to familiarise themselves with it.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Affordances

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id equity-informed-genai-policies-and-reviewer-education
title Institutions should adopt equity-informed GenAI policies, require AI-use disclosure, and educate reviewers on World Englishes variation
description The dialogue's contributors converge on institutional actions: developing inclusive guidelines for linguistic variation, promoting critical GenAI literacy, and providing editing support, so that reviewers, editors and...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ugwuanyi-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.