Use expert appropriateness assessment of a designed learning model as the basis for further system development and future outcome studies¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

The article recommends treating expert evaluation of a newly designed learning model as an initial design-stage checkpoint before implementation. The authors state that "Assessment of the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse to enhance young innovators is an assessment of the appropriateness of the initial design and development for use as a guideline for developing the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse in the future." They further recommend that "For further study, exploration of learning achievements and imagineering design skills should be considered," and that satisfaction studies should reflect whether the implemented model and processes are suitable.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• A panel of experts in learning model and system design
• Five-level rating-scale assessment forms with defined interpretation criteria

Constraints¶

• This strategy validates design appropriateness only; the article explicitly defers learning achievement and skill outcomes to further study

Target Learners¶

• developers of learning models and systems in higher education

Target Learning Goals¶

• designing and validating technology-supported learning models

Related Strategies¶

• Involve domain experts throughout the AI safety evaluation pipeline, especially for defining unsafe content

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Sapliyan, S., Chatwattana, P., & Nilsook, P. (2023). Constructionism Imagineering Learning Model via Metaverse to Enhance Young Innovators. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n4p81