Five-step discourse mapping procedure for representing a contested knowledge debate¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The paper offers a implementable recipe for social cartography: choose the debate to map; select the widest range of texts and translate their defining rhetorical characteristics; identify the range of positions on chosen ontological axes; locate and interrelate textual communities while "resisting all modernist urges to box-in or lay down a grid"; and field test the map with the communities involved, re-mapping as desired. The author presents this "cookbook" fashion process as an oppositional postmodern strategy that translates across interacting sites of material inscriptions.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Access to the texts constructing the debate and participation of the mapped knowledge communities in field testing
Constraints¶
- The author acknowledges colleagues' horror at the cookbook format and Watson's warning that planners may dismiss such maps as esoteric
Target Learners¶
- education researchers undertaking discourse analysis
Target Learning Goals¶
- representing multiperspectival debates spatially
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Paulston, Rolland G. (1999). Comparative Education After Postmodernity: Occasional Paper Series. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED430912
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
five-step-discourse-mapping-procedure |
title |
Five-step discourse mapping procedure for representing a contested knowledge debate |
description |
The paper offers a implementable recipe for social cartography: choose the debate to map; select the widest range of texts and translate their defining rhetorical characteristics; identify the range of positions on ch... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — paulston-1999 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.