Follow-up work after release, including probationary periods and environment change, secures social adjustment¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The outline makes follow-up work one of the most important activities for securing proper social adjustment after institutional training. A probationary period is frequently most valuable, during which the individual is studied in reactions to the new environment, and a change into a different environment from that where the delinquencies occurred is often needed after release.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Follow-up must also ascertain the real merits and efficiencies of what has been done in the institution and satisfy standards the individual has acquired
Constraints¶
- The authors warn that nothing is so uneconomical as to have a breakdown after years of educational treatment
Target Learners¶
- released young offenders
Target Learning Goals¶
- normal social adjustment after institutional training
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- William Healy and Augusta F. Bronner. (1916). An Outline for Institutional Education and Treatment of Young Offenders. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071384
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
follow-up-work-after-release |
title |
Follow-up work after release, including probationary periods and environment change, secures social adjustment |
description |
The outline makes follow-up work one of the most important activities for securing proper social adjustment after institutional training. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — william-healy-and-augusta-f-bronner-1916 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.