Sustain teacher residencies through blended federal and state funding, including TQP grants, ESSER funds, and dedicated state investments¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The report describes a range of funding sources states use to launch and sustain residencies. The Teacher Quality Partnership grant program is a primary federal vehicle; despite being authorized at $300 million annually, it was funded at just $70 million for fiscal year 2024. States have also used one-time ESSER funds — the Council of Chief State School Officers estimates states spent at least $79.1 million on residencies — Title II, Part A of ESSA, IDEA Part D, and AmeriCorps. California's investment, totaling more than $670 million over 5 years, is the largest in the nation, and New Mexico's grew from $1 million in 2019 to $15.5 million in 2022.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- upfront investment to support paid, yearlong, intensive clinical preparation through district–preparation-program partnerships
Constraints¶
- Federal COVID-19 relief funds are one-time; the report suggests ESSER investments could serve as a model for scaling future federal investments.
Target Learners¶
- teacher residency candidates and the PK–12 students they will teach
Target Learning Goals¶
- building a well-prepared, equitably distributed, and stable teacher workforce
Related Strategies¶
- Sustain and expand residency pathways through maintained state grant funding, financial aid, apprenticeship structures, and technical assistance
- Recommendations for sustainable and affordable residency programs: align with LEA strategy, engage system leaders, dedicate sustainability roles, and run affordability analyses
- Federal policy should invest in high-quality professional learning for educators, prioritizing preparation and professional development designs including teachers teaching teachers
- State policy levers for sustaining yearlong, stipended clinical preparation: require or incentivize full-year stipended clinical experience, fund partnerships, and reduce testing fees
- District investment of LCFF funds in residency stipends written into Local Control and Accountability Plans as a workforce development strategy
- Five state policy actions to sustain and scale teacher residencies
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Saunders, R., Fitz, J., DiNapoli, M. A., Jr., & Kini, T. (2024). Teacher residencies: State and federal policy to support comprehensive teacher preparation. Learning Policy Institute & EdPrepLab. https://doi.org/10.54300/358.825
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
funding-teacher-residencies-federal-state |
title |
Sustain teacher residencies through blended federal and state funding, including TQP grants, ESSER funds, and dedicated state investments |
description |
The report describes a range of funding sources states use to launch and sustain residencies. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — saunders-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.