Strategies

Design future resilience-intervention research as large pragmatic RCTs with sufficient follow-up and explicit resilience definitions

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 1 study (1 quant-synthesis), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The review closes with design recommendations for future studies of resilience interventions in practicing physicians. It recommends that "future research include large pragmatic RCTs with sufficient follow-up time", and that trials define what they mean by resilience and whether the outcome measure actually measures resilience or another proxy outcome. It also calls for a consensus on the definition of resilience and how it is measured, and for longer follow-up to ensure effects are sustained.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.