Strategies

Ground ethical inquiry into AI in the realities of teaching, assessment, leadership, and professional judgement rather than treating it as external compliance

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

Based on the bibliometric finding that AI ethics research is reorienting toward practice-based, interpretive, and relational frameworks, the article recommends that "ethical inquiry into AI must be grounded in the realities of teaching, assessment, leadership, and professional judgement, rather than treated as an external compliance requirement". It further suggests future research benefit from integrating bibliometric mapping with qualitative and interpretive investigations of how professionals interpret and enact AI ethics in real-world educational settings.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Affordances

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id ground-ai-ethics-inquiry-in-teaching-practice
title Ground ethical inquiry into AI in the realities of teaching, assessment, leadership, and professional judgement rather than treating it as external compliance
description Based on the bibliometric finding that AI ethics research is reorienting toward practice-based, interpretive, and relational frameworks, the article recommends that "ethical inquiry into AI must be grounded in the rea...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chamil-arkhasa-nikko-mazlan-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.