Use growth measures rather than achievement as the primary indicator of school effectiveness in ESSA accountability¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 2 studies (2 associational),q1–q2· 0 of 2 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article recommends that states judge the effectiveness of low-achieving schools primarily with growth metrics rather than achievement, because achievement is strongly predicted by school poverty and biases accountability against schools serving low-income students. It states an equitable policy should require the "Use of appropriate measures of growth to judge the “effectiveness” of low-achieving schools for ESSA accountability purposes without a significant bias introduced from using measures of achievement." It also recommends public reporting of both achievement and growth using well-constructed measures.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Well-constructed growth measures with appropriate analytical methodologies, such as normed conditional growth percentiles
Constraints¶
- ESSA still requires achievement to be included in school evaluation, and states weight achievement from 15% to 50% in their plans
Target Learners¶
- Students in low-achieving and high-poverty Title I schools
Target Learning Goals¶
- Fair identification of Comprehensive Support and Improvement schools and recognition of schools producing high learning growth
Claims¶
- Maryland lacked a measure of schools' support of academic growth from kindergarten to grade 3, creating a critical accountability need under ESSA [+W]
- Growth rates varied tremendously between schools regardless of poverty, with top-quartile schools producing more than double the growth of the worst quartile [+W]
Related Strategies¶
- State boards should set realistic annual targets and invest in data infrastructure and collaborative time for improvement
- Sequenced multi-year investment plan across teacher and principal pipelines, early childhood, high-poverty schools, funding, and assessment and accountability to achieve Leandro compliance
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Andy Hegedus, Ed.D. (2018). Evaluating the Relationships between Poverty and School Performance. NWEA Research Report. https://www.nwea.org/research-data-galleries/poverty-and-school-performance
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
growth-based-essa-accountability-for-low-achieving-schools |
title |
Use growth measures rather than achievement as the primary indicator of school effectiveness in ESSA accountability |
description |
The article recommends that states judge the effectiveness of low-achieving schools primarily with growth metrics rather than achievement, because achievement is strongly predicted by school poverty and biases account... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — andy-hegedus-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.