Institutional safeguards for safe, transparent AI use in assessment¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The paper assigns institutions minimum responsibilities for enabling AI-mediated assessment: completing a privacy/data-protection impact assessment (PIA/DPIA) for any AI tool used in assessment with clear data-flow maps and student-facing summaries; vetting and approving tools against privacy, bias, accessibility and auditability criteria; and standardising prompt/process transparency conventions such as prompt-log formats and version control. These conditions let students evidence how they worked without disclosing personal data.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Institutional settings must enable safe and transparent use so students and staff can be explicit about AI-mediated work without privacy or equity penalties
Constraints¶
- Free tiers and institutional AI offerings vary in availability, capability and accessibility
Target Learners¶
- higher education students and staff
Target Learning Goals¶
- responsible participation in digital professional environments
- data privacy awareness
Related Strategies¶
- Establish comprehensive institutional AI governance frameworks including task forces, roadmaps, and transparent policies
- Establish AI-specific evaluation and accountability systems using independent audits, role-based dashboards, and privacy and equity safeguards
- Address core ethical challenges—data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and transparency—when deploying AI-driven personalized learning
- Require process transparency artefacts: process logs, prompt records, reflective commentaries and oral defences
- Institutional governance should establish practical conditions supporting AI literacy, learner agency, and critical evaluation rather than relying on prohibition and detection
- Deploy soft barriers transparently: institutional approval, policy-level disclosure, and accessibility testing
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Kickbusch, S., Ashford-Rowe, K., Kemp, A., Boreland, J., & Huijser, H. (2025). Beyond Detection: Redesigning Authentic Assessment in an AI-Mediated World. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111537
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
institutional-ai-safeguards-assessment |
title |
Institutional safeguards for safe, transparent AI use in assessment |
description |
The paper assigns institutions minimum responsibilities for enabling AI-mediated assessment: completing a privacy/data-protection impact assessment (PIA/DPIA) for any AI tool used in assessment with clear data-flow ma... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kickbusch-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.