Integrate autonomy and agency paradigms, standardise instruments, probe non-demographic moderators, and extend evaluations to longitudinal real-world settings¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 review),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study
Description¶
The review derives four research and design recommendations for advancing autonomy-supportive robot design: integrating autonomy and agency paradigms in study designs, standardising definitions and instruments, probing moderating user traits beyond demographics, and extending evaluations beyond short laboratory tasks into longitudinal, real-world settings. The authors state these steps "could help advance autonomy-supportive robot design strategies that uphold ethical and psychological principles and foster user well-being in HRI."
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Study designs that measure both human autonomy and sense of agency, using standardised instruments, in settings extending beyond short laboratory tasks
Constraints¶
- Current evidence base is limited to 22 predominantly short, lab-based studies concentrated on interface and task spheres
Target Learners¶
- HRI researchers, practitioners, and policymakers designing or regulating robots for education, health and care, industry, hospitality, and delivery
Target Learning Goals¶
- Fostering human autonomy and sense of agency, and user well-being, in human-robot interaction
Claims¶
Related Strategies¶
- Prioritize inclusive-by-design architectures, interoperable agent frameworks, human-AI collaboration models, and real-world implementation studies
- Prioritise longitudinal validation, pedagogical grounding, governed adoption of agent infrastructures, and ethics with human oversight in educational agentic AI research
- Advance AI-motivation research through theory-driven, pedagogically explicit, longitudinal designs covering broader motivational constructs
- Study effort regulation in real-world, personally relevant contexts over longer timeframes, including via ecological momentary assessment
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Glawe, F., Schmeckel, T., Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2025). Human Autonomy and Sense of Agency in Human-Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22271. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22271
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
integrate-paradigms-longitudinal-hri-autonomy-research |
title |
Integrate autonomy and agency paradigms, standardise instruments, probe non-demographic moderators, and extend evaluations to longitudinal real-world settings |
description |
The review derives four research and design recommendations for advancing autonomy-supportive robot design: integrating autonomy and agency paradigms in study designs, standardising definitions and instruments, probin... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — glawe-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.