Use QCGE self-assessments as a basis for formative group evaluation and integrate them into group-awareness or engagement-feedback tools¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 associational), q3 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description¶

The article recommends that lecturers use a QCGE self-assessment to gain information about the quality of collaborative work in learning groups, e.g. as formative evaluation at group level. It further proposes that "a QCGE self-assessment could be used as a basis for adapting and developing learning processes within learning groups and could usefully be integrated into group-awareness tools" or automated group engagement feedback tools, giving groups an opportunity to reflect on and regulate their group processes.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• A standardised, easy-to-use self-assessment measure of group-level engagement, such as the QCGE-SAS

Constraints¶

• Subjective and observation-based ratings of the same group can diverge, so self-assessment is proposed as one perspective within multi-method approaches, not a replacement for observation

Target Learners¶

• student learning groups in higher education

Target Learning Goals¶

• reflection on and regulation of group processes leading to better group learning outcomes

Affordances¶

• Qcge Framework Four Dimensions

Claims¶

• Construct validity of the QCGE-SAS is supported by significant correlations between its subscales and pre-validated related scales [+W]
• Behavioural, cognitive and conceptual-to-consequential subscales of the QCGE-SAS show acceptable reliability, while the social engagement subscale shows unacceptable internal consistency [~W]

Related Strategies¶

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Loris T. Jeitziner, Lisa Paneth, Oliver Rack, Susanne Bleisch, Carmen Zahn. (2025). Measuring the quality of collaborative group engagement: Development and validation of the QCGE self-assessment scale (QCGE-SAS). Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09445-8