Use quarterly IPP indicator data and twice-yearly data reviews with LEAs for continuous quality improvement¶

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited

Description¶

Project Cal-Well partners "provided quarterly Infrastructure Development, Prevention, and Mental Health Promotion (IPP) Indicator data to demonstrate progress toward annual goals." Twice a year, UCSF and the CDE met with the LEAs "to review data and progress to inform continuous quality improvement." This routine indicator reporting plus scheduled joint data-review meetings is the brief's stated mechanism for monitoring progress toward annual goals and adjusting implementation.

Design Implications¶

Context¶

Requirements¶

• Partners must submit quarterly IPP Indicator data, and evaluation and state leadership must convene LEAs twice yearly to review the data

Constraints¶

• Implemented within the Project Cal-Well grant evaluation structure led by UCSF and the CDE

Target Learners¶

• Local educational agency staff and program leaders implementing school-based mental health systems

Target Learning Goals¶

• Continuous quality improvement of school-based mental health infrastructure and services

Related Strategies¶

• Sustain district mental health initiatives by braiding grant funding into annual plans, ongoing surveys, and reimbursement streams

Examples¶

-

Key Sources¶

• Project Cal-Well: Building Sustainable School-Based Mental Health Systems. (2024). WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED655927