Use established routines such as course-map and unit-plan review cycles to monitor and sustain instructional work¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The schools used established and repeated activities to guide and sustain instructional improvement, setting common expectations, providing guidelines, and creating feedback mechanisms. Two schools regularly reviewed course maps and unit plans; one assistant principal described unit plans "submitted on a rolling basis every five weeks," timed to progress-report grading cycles, with administrators reviewing and returning comments to teachers.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Administrative capacity to review submitted plans and return feedback on a regular schedule
Constraints¶
Target Learners¶
- high school teachers and administrators
Target Learning Goals¶
- consistent, coherent instructional planning and improvement
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- David Stevens, Sue Sporte, Sara Ray Stoelinga, Alissa Bolz. (2008). Lessons from High Performing Small High Schools in Chicago. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/lessons-high-performing-small-high-schools-chicago
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
routines-monitor-course-maps-unit-plans |
title |
Use established routines such as course-map and unit-plan review cycles to monitor and sustain instructional work |
description |
The schools used established and repeated activities to guide and sustain instructional improvement, setting common expectations, providing guidelines, and creating feedback mechanisms. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — david-stevens-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.