Solicit and formally review unsolicited scholarly responses when publishing a controversial position¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
When a journal publishes a controversial position, it can invite both solicited and unsolicited short responses from scholars, subject them to formal review and likely revision, and publish them in a subsequent issue. The editorial states that "any submission will not be automatically accepted for publication but will be subjected to a formal review process and likely revision requests."
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- A guest editor to coordinate responses and prospective authors contacting the editor with intent to write
Constraints¶
- Page limit for responses is brief, 10-15 pages, and submissions are not automatically accepted
Target Learners¶
- Education researchers and scholars writing responses to position papers
Target Learning Goals¶
- Scholarly debate and critical evaluation of research-based recommendations
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Daniel H. Robinson. (2013). Editor's Note. Educ Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9226-2
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
solicit-reviewed-responses-to-controversial-positions |
title |
Solicit and formally review unsolicited scholarly responses when publishing a controversial position |
description |
When a journal publishes a controversial position, it can invite both solicited and unsolicited short responses from scholars, subject them to formal review and likely revision, and publish them in a subsequent issue. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — daniel-h-robinson-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.