Strategies

Rigorously test SD–R propositions using longitudinal and shortitudinal designs, including interaction and spiral tests

Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 1 study (1 review), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study

Description

The article sets a research agenda for validating SD–R theory: studies should test whether health impairment and motivational processes are unique and predict different outcomes, test statistical interactions between study demands and resources, and test loss and gain spirals. It recommends "longitudinal research designs with months or years between the assessments, or “shortitudinal” designs" with daily or weekly assessments so causal and reversed causal effects can be modeled, plus rigorous qualitative research on students' demands and resources.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Goals

Affordances

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type strategy
id test-sd-r-propositions-longitudinal-designs
title Rigorously test SD–R propositions using longitudinal and shortitudinal designs, including interaction and spiral tests
description The article sets a research agenda for validating SD–R theory: studies should test whether health impairment and motivational processes are unique and predict different outcomes, test statistical interactions between...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — arnold-b-bakker-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.