Claims

A systematic review of 168 papers yielded 1669 communication skills learning outcomes, refined to a final set of 205

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Systematic searching of five databases identified 168 eligible papers from which 1669 individual learning outcomes were extracted, and qualitative synthesis condensed these to 205 refined outcomes. → Denniston C 2017

Evidence

Denniston C 2017

Denniston C, Molloy E, Nestel D, Woodward-Kron R, Keating JL. (2017). Learning outcomes for communication skills across the health professions: a systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014570

q3 · i? · qualitative · r3

Systematic review and qualitative synthesis searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL plus and Scopus to August 2016. The review reports that "168 papers met the eligibility criteria" and 1669 outcomes were extracted, refined to a final set of 205 presented in 4 domains.

"168 papers met the eligibility criteria; 1669 individual learning outcomes were extracted and refined using qualitative synthesis. A final refined set of 205 learning outcomes were constructed and are presented in 4 domains"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.