Claims

Published communication skills learning outcomes are often unclear or absent: only 208 of 945 full-text screened papers reported specific outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of 945 full-text screened papers, only 208 reported specific learning outcomes, and reported outcomes often targeted two to three constructs per statement, included value-laden words such as 'good', and were ambiguous in intention. → Denniston C 2017

Evidence

Denniston C 2017

Denniston C, Molloy E, Nestel D, Woodward-Kron R, Keating JL. (2017). Learning outcomes for communication skills across the health professions: a systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014570

q3 · i? · review · r3

Review discussion of outcome quality across screened literature. The article reports "only 208 papers, of the 945 full text screened, reporting specific learning outcomes" and notes value-laden words and ambiguous intention in reported outcomes.

"This was reflected in the current review with only 208 papers, of the 945 full text screened, reporting specific learning outcomes for the education described"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.