A systematic review identified 26 studies of aneurysm clipping simulation, most commonly virtual reality platforms (n = 11), followed by ex vivo methods and 3D static models (n = 6 each) and 3D dynamic models (n = 3)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Of 2068 articles screened, 26 studies met inclusion criteria, spanning ex vivo (n = 6), VR (n = 11), 3D static (n = 6), and 3D dynamic (n = 3) simulation approaches. → Joseph Fredrick J. 2023
Evidence¶
Joseph Fredrick J. 2023¶
Joseph Fredrick J., Vanluchene Hanne E. R., Bervini David. (2023). Simulation training approaches in intracranial aneurysm surgery—a systematic review. Neurosurgical Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01995-5
q3 · i? · review · r2
Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and PsycInfo through 21 September 2022. The abstract reports the screening yield: "Of the 2068 articles screened, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria" across four simulation categories.
"Of the 2068 articles screened, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The chosen reports used a wide range of simulation approaches including ex vivo methods (n = 6); virtual reality (VR) platforms (n = 11); and static (n = 6) and dynamic (n = 3) 3D-printed aneurysm models (n = 6)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Each simulation approach has distinct limitations: ex vivo methods have limited availability, VR simulators lack haptics and tactility, 3D static models lack microanatomical components and blood flow, and 3D dynamic models miss microanatomical components — related
- Construct validity evidence: experienced neurosurgeons performed significantly better than trainees on aneurysm clipping simulation models — related
- Existing aneurysm clipping training methods are heterogeneous and do not realistically simulate the complete microsurgical workflow — related
- Residents training on placenta models performed better than residents training on cadavers or only having surgical videos available — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.