Residents training on placenta models performed better than residents training on cadavers or only having surgical videos available¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In de Oliveira et al. (2018), residents training on placenta models performed better than residents training on cadavers or only having surgical videos available. → Joseph Fredrick J. 2023

Evidence¶

Joseph Fredrick J. 2023¶

Joseph Fredrick J., Vanluchene Hanne E. R., Bervini David. (2023). Simulation training approaches in intracranial aneurysm surgery—a systematic review. Neurosurgical Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01995-5

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing de Oliveira et al. 2018, this comparative finding from the ex vivo cadaver/placenta category. The review also notes the placenta model required more extended time to complete the task and was more effective for sylvian fissure splitting and aneurysm dissection.

"Oliveira et al. (2018) [13] showed that residents training on placenta models performed better than residents training on cadavers or only having surgical videos available."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A systematic review identified 26 studies of aneurysm clipping simulation, most commonly virtual reality platforms (n = 11), followed by ex vivo methods and 3D static models (n = 6 each) and 3D dynamic models (n = 3) — related
• Cadaver models were perceived as the most anatomically realistic and outperformed placenta models on face validity, with no content-validity difference — related
• High-fidelity simulation methods (simulators, 3D models, cadaver-based practice) are associated with superior Acquisition retention, though some studies report contradictory findings — a broader claim this one bears on
• Meta-analyses report better post-test results for 3DPAM instruction, especially for complex anatomical structures and medical students — related