Claims

Only 35 of 2814 identified studies describe data-driven assessment tools implemented in laparoscopic skills training curricula for surgical residents

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of 2814 unique studies screened, only 35 (5%) met inclusion criteria for data-driven assessment integrated into resident training curricula. → Hardon Sem F. 2025

Evidence

Hardon Sem F. 2025

Hardon Sem F., Horeman Tim, Reijers Sophie J. M., Schoonmade Linda J., Daams Freek, van der Peet Donald L. (2025). The Implementation of Data-Driven Assessment into Laparoscopic Skills Training: A Systematic Review. Surgical Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251336824

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines searched PubMed and Embase; full-text screening of 718 studies found "193 studies (27%) described assessment that was not technology-enhanced" and only 35 studies (5%) were included.

"The full- text of the remaining studies (n = 718) underwent qualitative analysis and were assessed for eligibility. Of these, we found that 193 studies (27%) described assessment that was not technology-enhanced and reported only time parameters, assessment form, or a combination."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.