Most learner-facing studies of technology-enhanced simulation in laparoscopic training report favorable learner responses, mainly confidence, satisfaction, perceived safety and self-efficacy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across 11 included studies, most learner-facing studies measuring perception, satisfaction, acceptance, confidence or self-efficacy reported favorable responses expressed through satisfaction, confidence, perceived safety, motivation, self-efficacy and willingness to engage in repeated practice. → Vega Ochoa AD 2026
Evidence¶
Vega Ochoa AD 2026¶
Vega Ochoa AD, Pinto Bautista HL, Weber Ipuana WJ, González Cuello MÁ, Díaz Pérez A. (2026). Student perceptions of technology-enhanced simulation resources in laparoscopic training: a scoping review and implications for surgical instrumentation. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10009-z
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative synthesis of the review's own included studies: of 11 studies included after screening 1,800 records, most learner-facing studies reported favorable responses. The review states favorable responses were "expressed through satisfaction, confidence, perceived safety, motivation, self-efficacy and willingness to engage in repeated practice." No pooled effect estimate was computed.
"most learner-facing studies that measured perception, satisfaction, acceptance, confidence or self-efficacy reported favorable responses to technology-enhanced simulation resources"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Favorable learner perception of laparoscopic simulation should not be equated with competence, clinical readiness or transfer of learning — related
- Experimental and quasi-experimental included studies describe improvements in time, precision, movement economy, task quality or perceived competence after laparoscopic simulation exposure — related
- Only one of 11 included studies directly addressed Surgical Instrumentation students, making most evidence indirect for that field — related
- Peer tutoring in clinical simulation is associated with improved technical skills such as laparoscopic tasks, lumbar puncture, and cardiovascular examination — related
- Learners valued safe, repeatable, nonjudgmental AI practice environments that reduced anxiety and bridged the theory-practice gap — related
- Peer tutoring in clinical simulation is associated with gains in non-technical skills including self-efficacy, self-confidence, self-perception of learning, and reflective abilities — related
- Face-to-face learning enabled direct educator feedback and skill practice, and one online clinical tool showed less value in clinical placement than classroom use — related
- N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone-embalmed donors showed significantly greater abdominal response to CO2 insufflation than formalin-embalmed donors, suggesting better suitability for laparoscopic simulation — related
- Only 35 of 2814 identified studies describe data-driven assessment tools implemented in laparoscopic skills training curricula for surgical residents — related
- Self-confidence gains from single-session simulation are often temporary, suggesting a dose–response effect — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.