The 5E model shows a moderate pooled effect on attitude scores versus traditional methods, with the article reporting no statistical significance on its Z-test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r1–r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Meta-analysis of 8 studies found a random effects effect size of ES=0.552 for attitude in favour of the 5E model, classified as moderate by Cohen (1992). → Özgür Anil 2015 q3 i? The article reports the attitude z-test as z=2.252 at p=0.431, indicating no statistical significance. → Özgür Anil 2015 (2)

Evidence¶

Özgür Anil 2015¶

Özgür Anil, Veli Batdi. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random effects model analysis of 8 attitude studies comparing the 5E model with traditional teaching. The article reports a mean effect size of 0.552 (SE 0.245, 95% CI 0.071-1.032) and interprets it as moderate and in favour of the 5E model.

"In the analysis of the 5E model performed according to the random effects model, standard error was calcu lated as 0.245; the upper limit of the confidence interval of 95% was found to be 1.032, the lower limit 0.071. Mean effect size was calculated as 0.552."

Özgür Anil 2015 (2)¶

Özgür Anil, Veli Batdi. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

The article's own significance test for the attitude effect: z=2.252 at p=0.431, which the article states indicated no statistical significance, despite interpreting the pooled effect size as moderate.

"Lastly, the z -test calculation found z=2.252, but at p=0.431 the analysis indicated no statistical significance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The 5E model shows a large pooled effect on retention scores versus traditional methods, though the article's own Z-test is reported as non-significant — related
• Effect sizes for achievement, retention and attitude were heterogeneous across studies, prompting the shift from fixed to random effects modelling — related