The 5E model shows a large pooled effect on retention scores versus traditional methods, though the article's own Z-test is reported as non-significant¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Meta-analysis of 5 studies found a random effects effect size of ES=1.417 for retention in favour of the 5E model, classified as large by Cohen (1992). → Özgür Anil 2015 q3 i? The article reports the retention Z-test result of Z=3.255 at p=0.311 as having no statistical significance, despite calling the effect size significant. → Özgür Anil 2015 (2)

Evidence¶

Özgür Anil 2015¶

Özgür Anil, Veli Batdi. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r1

Random effects model analysis of 5 retention studies comparing the 5E model with traditional teaching. The article reports ES=1.417 and interprets it as a large positive effect on students' retention scores.

"The results of the ensui ng analysis led to the calculation of an effect size of ES=1.417. This value indicates a positive and significant effect size for the 5E model. According to the classification by Cohen (1992), this is to be considered a large effect size."

Özgür Anil 2015 (2)¶

Özgür Anil, Veli Batdi. (2015). A Comparative Meta-Analysis of 5E and Traditional Approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

The article's own significance test for the retention effect: Z=3.255 at p=0.311, which the article itself states had no statistical significance, in tension with its description of ES=1.417 as significant.

"In addition, the Z -test was used to determine statistical significance and the result was Z=3.255. This result may be interpreted to mean that the analysis at p=0.311 had no statistical significance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The 5E model shows a moderate pooled effect on attitude scores versus traditional methods, with the article reporting no statistical significance on its Z-test — related
• The 5E instructional model shows a large, significant pooled effect on academic achievement versus traditional teaching methods in Turkish studies (2008-2014) — related
• Effect sizes for achievement, retention and attitude were heterogeneous across studies, prompting the shift from fixed to random effects modelling — related
• The 5E learning model has a large positive effect on students' science process skills compared with traditional teaching — related
• The 5E and related models significantly improve mathematics achievement (g = 0.70), though sensitivity analyses suggest the estimate may be smaller in practice — related
• Learning-styles-tailored instruction shows a large pooled effect on retention, with inconsistent printed values (d = 1.763 in Table 7; d = 1.290 in the abstract and discussion) — related