The effect of the 7E learning cycle does not differ significantly by school level, publication type, or intervention duration¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Sub-group analyses found non-significant between-group differences for school level (QB(2) = 2.847, p > .05), publication type (QB(2) = .128, p > .05), and duration (QB = 2.287, p = .242). → Balta 2016

Evidence¶

Balta 2016¶

Balta, N., & Sarac, H. (2016). The Effect of 7E Learning Cycle on Learning in Science Teaching: A meta-Analysis Study. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.2.61

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analytic sub-group analyses across publication type (article, master thesis, PhD thesis), school level (middle school, high school, university), and duration (long, short, blank). The quote states the three non-significant groupings; the printed QB statistics appear in Table 4 and the results text.

"The effect of 7E was not significant for school level, type of publication and duration. However, regarding the subject matter a significant difference was observed."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Duration of 7E interventions was not significantly correlated with effect size; short interventions did not yield smaller effects than long ones — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• The effect of the 7E learning cycle on achievement differs significantly by subject matter, with the largest average for chemistry and the smallest for science — related
• Application period, publication type, database, grade level, scale used, school starting age, country and sample size do not significantly moderate the effect of student-centred methods on mathematics achievement — related
• Effect of learning stations does not differ significantly by application duration — related
• The effect of multiple intelligence practices does not differ significantly by type of study (article, master's thesis, doctoral thesis) — related
• Effect sizes differ significantly by publication type, with master's theses and articles showing higher effects than PhD theses. — related
• Academic achievement effects of STEM practices differ significantly by publication type and education level but not by lesson type — related
• Publication type, course type, educational level, and experimental duration did not significantly moderate the effect of context-based learning on academic achievement — related