Application period, publication type, database, grade level, scale used, school starting age, country and sample size do not significantly moderate the effect of student-centred methods on mathematics achievement¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Except for application approach, no moderator showed a statistically significant difference; for example, application period did not change the effect size (QB = 4.058, p > 0.05). → Hakan Ulum 2022 q3 i? Meta-regression on sample size found the regression coefficient d = -0.0009 was non-significant (p = 0.4635), so each participant increase in sample size does not change the effect size. → Hakan Ulum 2022 (2)

Evidence¶

Hakan Ulum 2022¶

Hakan Ulum, Songül Tümkaya. (2022). The effect of student-centred methods and techniques on primary school students' mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis study. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML). https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/mjml/index

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Analog ANOVA moderator analyses across eight categorical moderators all returned non-significant between-group variance (application period QB = 4.058; publication type QB = 0.084; database QB = 2.248; grade level QB = 0.634; scale QB = 2.861; school starting age QB = 5.122; country QB = 6.562).

"According to the results obtained from the m oderator analysis for the experimental application period, the variance between studies was not statistically significant (QB = 4.058, p> 0.05)."

Hakan Ulum 2022 (2)¶

Hakan Ulum, Songül Tümkaya. (2022). The effect of student-centred methods and techniques on primary school students' mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis study. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML). https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/mjml/index

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-regression for the continuous sample-size moderator (studies ranged between 30 and 261 participants) reports an intercept of 0.8605 and a sample coefficient of -0.0009 with p = 0.4635, indicating sample size does not change the effect size.

"the regression coeffici ent (d = -0.0009) value for the sample will correspond to a decrease (-) of 0.0009 in the effect size of each participant included in the sample."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The effect of the 7E learning cycle does not differ significantly by school level, publication type, or intervention duration — related
• The application approach (which student-centred method or technique is used) significantly moderates the effect size, with Activities Based on Multiple Intelligences and Educational Games showing the largest effects — related
• Publication type and study origin do not significantly moderate the digital story effect on academic achievement — related
• Effect of learning stations does not differ significantly by application duration — related
• The effect size does not vary significantly with sample size or publication year in meta-regression — related
• The effect of multiple intelligence practices on achievement increases as the implementation period becomes longer — reports the opposite
• Effect sizes do not differ significantly by sample size, practice time, or constructivist method used. — related
• Student-centred strategies, methods and techniques produce a moderate-to-high overall effect on primary school students' mathematics achievement compared to traditional teaching (ES = 0.787, random-effects model) — related
• Publication type, course type, educational level, and experimental duration did not significantly moderate the effect of context-based learning on academic achievement — related
• The effect of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement differs significantly by implemented technique, with multiple intelligence-assisted and STAD techniques largest — related
• The effect of games on mathematics achievement does not differ significantly by implementation period — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• The effect of games on mathematics achievement does not differ significantly by sample size — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• The effect of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement does not differ significantly by implementation period — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Group size significantly moderates the effect of context-based learning on academic achievement, with studies under 100 participants showing stronger effects than studies over 100 — related