Claims

Within-group score changes across pre-test, post-test and retention test were significant in both pretested groups, with larger variance explained in the experimental group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant change across measurements in experiment-1 with eta-squared .76. → Sarac 2017 q3 i3 Control-1 also improved significantly across measurements with eta-squared .51, attributed to the curriculum methods. → Sarac 2017

Evidence

Sarac 2017

Sarac, H., & Tarhan, D. (2017). Effect of multimedia assisted 7e learning model applications on academic achievement and retention in students. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.299

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

One-way repeated-measures ANOVA on experiment-1's pre-test, post-test and retention scores (n=23). F(1.5-33.6)=69.353, p<.05, eta-squared .76; control-1's parallel ANOVA gave F(2-44)=22.783, p<.05, eta-squared .51. Bonferroni comparisons favored post-test and retention test over pre-test.

"there is a statistically significant difference between the test -1 group pre-test and the post-test and retention test averages according to the result of the one -way ANOVA, (F (1.5-33.6) = 69.353, p < .05). Also, the effect size between the average is .76."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.