Ability-grouping composition in reciprocal teaching of collaborative learning significantly affects social skills, with the high homogeneous group showing the largest mean gain (10.92) and the low homogeneous group the smallest (6.71)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Social skills differ significantly among the grouping compositions in collaborative learning. → Sumadi 2017 q2 i? The high homogeneous group shows the highest mean social-skills gain and the low homogeneous group the lowest. → Sumadi 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Sumadi 2017¶

Sumadi, I. N. S. Degeng, Sulthon, & Waras. (2017). Effect of Ability Grouping in Reciprocal Teaching Technique of Collaborative Learning on Individual Achievements and Social Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(3), 216-220. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1157151

q2 · i? · causal · r2

MANOVA of social skills in the same quasi-experiment yielded F = 21.062, exceeding the tabled value of 3.1258 (df 1 = 2, df 2 = 71), with significance 0.000 < 0.05, leading to rejection of H0 and a conclusion of "differences in students’ social skills" among groups.

"Therefore the value of F (21.062) > F table (3.1258) and a significant value is 0.000 < 0.05, then it can be taken a decision to reject H 0. So we can conclude that there are differences in students’ social skills between high homogeneous group, low homogeneous group, and heterogeneous group in collaborative learning."

Sumadi 2017 (2)¶

Sumadi, I. N. S. Degeng, Sulthon, & Waras. (2017). Effect of Ability Grouping in Reciprocal Teaching Technique of Collaborative Learning on Individual Achievements and Social Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(3), 216-220. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1157151

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics from the same study rank mean social-skills increases: 10.92 (high homogeneous), 8.75 (heterogeneous), 8.55 (middle homogeneous), and 6.71 (low homogeneous), with "the lowest of the low group of homogeneous".

"Based on the results of descriptive statistical analysis showed that the social skills on high group of homogeneous showed mean the highest increase in the amount of 10.92, the second a heterogeneous group with a mean increase of 8.75, followed middle group of homogeneous with a mean increase of 8.55, and the lowest of the low group of homogeneous with a mean increase of 6.71."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Ability-grouping composition in reciprocal teaching of collaborative learning significantly affects individual achievement, with the high homogeneous group showing the largest mean gain (19.5) and the low homogeneous group the smallest (11.75) — related
• All pairwise comparisons of grouping compositions differ significantly on individual achievement, including the heterogeneous group versus each homogeneous group — related
• The heterogeneous group ranks second on individual achievement gains, behind the high homogeneous group — related
• Quality of explanations is higher in groups containing above-average students than in groups without them — related