All pairwise comparisons of grouping compositions differ significantly on individual achievement, including the heterogeneous group versus each homogeneous group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? LSD post-hoc tests show significant achievement differences between every pair of grouping compositions, including heterogeneous versus each homogeneous group. → Sumadi 2017

Evidence¶

Sumadi 2017¶

Sumadi, I. N. S. Degeng, Sulthon, & Waras. (2017). Effect of Ability Grouping in Reciprocal Teaching Technique of Collaborative Learning on Individual Achievements and Social Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(3), 216-220. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1157151

q2 · i? · causal · r1

LSD post-hoc tests in the quasi-experiment report significance values below 0.05 for all six pairwise comparisons among the four grouping compositions, e.g. "the high group of homogeneous with the heterogeneous group significance value of 0.002".

"While LSD test results show that among the high group of homogeneous with the middle group of homogeneous significance value of 0.00, the high group of homogeneous with the low group of homogeneous significance value of 0.00, the high group of homogeneous with the heterogeneous group significance value of 0.002, the middle group of homogeneous with the low group of homogeneous significance val ue of 0.00, the middle group of homogeneous with the heterogeneous group significance value of 0,016, and the low group of homogeneous with the heterogeneous group significance value of 0,016."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Ability-grouping composition in reciprocal teaching of collaborative learning significantly affects individual achievement, with the high homogeneous group showing the largest mean gain (19.5) and the low homogeneous group the smallest (11.75) — related
• Ability-grouping composition in reciprocal teaching of collaborative learning significantly affects social skills, with the high homogeneous group showing the largest mean gain (10.92) and the low homogeneous group the smallest (6.71) — related
• Heterogeneously grouped teams show more benefits than homogeneously formed teams — related
• Homogeneous grouping for reading instruction and heterogeneous grouping for discussion groups each serve distinct purposes — related