Claims

Arts-based methods in community-based research raise specific ethical challenges around anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions, alongside practical limits of time, training and cost

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Four ethical concerns were identified: protecting privacy and informed consent, ownership of participant-produced artworks, representation of vulnerable participants, and emotional risks for participants and researchers. → Sara Coemans 2017 q2 i? Practical limitations included time-consuming processes, need for facilitator training, and costs of equipment, expositions and artist collaboration. → Sara Coemans 2017 (2)

Evidence

Sara Coemans 2017

Sara Coemans, Karin Hannes. (2017). Researchers Under the Spell of the Arts: Two Decades of Using Arts-Based Methods in Community-Based Inquiry with Vulnerable Populations. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of limitations. The review cites Moletsane and colleagues (2009) on the risk that publicly acknowledging authorship exposes participants to sanctions, and notes researchers hold power to decide how people are interpreted, risking further stigmatization.

"Using arts-based methods poses new ethical challenges in conducting research. Some of these ethical concerns were identified in this review: i.e. anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions."

Sara Coemans 2017 (2)

Sara Coemans, Karin Hannes. (2017). Researchers Under the Spell of the Arts: Two Decades of Using Arts-Based Methods in Community-Based Inquiry with Vulnerable Populations. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports a lack of time as a limitation of many studies, that more training was needed to prepare facilitators or participants, and practical costs including equipment such as digital cameras, projectors, color printers and laptops, plus costs of expositions and artist collaboration.

"Using ABR methods may demand long term processes and an increased amount of time, training and resources."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id abr-ethical-practical-challenges
title Arts-based methods in community-based research raise specific ethical challenges around anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions, alongside practical limits of time, training and cost
description Arts-based methods in community-based research raise specific ethical challenges around anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions, alongside practical limits of time, training and cost
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — sara-coemans-2017, sara-coemans-2017-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.