Arts-based methods in community-based research raise specific ethical challenges around anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions, alongside practical limits of time, training and cost¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Four ethical concerns were identified: protecting privacy and informed consent, ownership of participant-produced artworks, representation of vulnerable participants, and emotional risks for participants and researchers. → Sara Coemans 2017
q2 i? Practical limitations included time-consuming processes, need for facilitator training, and costs of equipment, expositions and artist collaboration. → Sara Coemans 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Sara Coemans 2017¶
Sara Coemans, Karin Hannes. (2017). Researchers Under the Spell of the Arts: Two Decades of Using Arts-Based Methods in Community-Based Inquiry with Vulnerable Populations. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003
q2 · i? · review · r3
Narrative synthesis of limitations. The review cites Moletsane and colleagues (2009) on the risk that publicly acknowledging authorship exposes participants to sanctions, and notes researchers hold power to decide how people are interpreted, risking further stigmatization.
"Using arts-based methods poses new ethical challenges in conducting research. Some of these ethical concerns were identified in this review: i.e. anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions."
Sara Coemans 2017 (2)¶
Sara Coemans, Karin Hannes. (2017). Researchers Under the Spell of the Arts: Two Decades of Using Arts-Based Methods in Community-Based Inquiry with Vulnerable Populations. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports a lack of time as a limitation of many studies, that more training was needed to prepare facilitators or participants, and practical costs including equipment such as digital cameras, projectors, color printers and laptops, plus costs of expositions and artist collaboration.
"Using ABR methods may demand long term processes and an increased amount of time, training and resources."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Arts-based methods in community-based research with vulnerable populations grew steadily in use from 1993 to 2013, with 90% of the 131 reviewed studies published between 2004 and 2013 — related
- Analyzing arts-based data was one of the biggest challenges in community-based arts-based research: what counts as data was unclear, conventional textual analyses dominated, and researcher-led versus participant-led interpretation each risked stereotyping — related
- Students raised four categories of concern about potential misuse of MMLA data: judgment, privacy, career impact, and academic integrity — related
- Ethics, privacy, bias, over-reliance, accuracy, usability and cost are key challenges AI use poses for learner satisfaction and engagement — related
- Algorithmic bias and data privacy are central ethical risks of AI in adult education — related
- The review identifies data privacy, algorithmic fairness, academic integrity, and unequal access as interconnected ethical concerns in AI-supported mathematics education — related
- Privacy protections lag behind reputational concerns: institutions rarely consider implications of capturing audio-visual and behavioral data from private spaces, and AI algorithms are seldom transparent about error rates — related
- Researchers adopt arts-based methods in community-based inquiry to challenge language-oriented methods, reduce power imbalances, give voice to vulnerable participants, engage hard-to-verbalize issues, motivate participation, and reach wider audiences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
abr-ethical-practical-challenges |
title |
Arts-based methods in community-based research raise specific ethical challenges around anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions, alongside practical limits of time, training and cost |
description |
Arts-based methods in community-based research raise specific ethical challenges around anonymity, ownership, representation and emotions, alongside practical limits of time, training and cost |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — sara-coemans-2017, sara-coemans-2017-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.