Claims

Students most liked the competing theories, news, and concept cartoon activities because these made creating and defending arguments easier

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students ranked competing theories, news, and concept cartoons as their favorite ABSL activities, citing easier argument creation and better expression of ideas. → Akbaş 2019

Evidence

Akbaş 2019

Akbaş, Y.; Şahin, İ. F.; Meral, E. (2019). Implementing Argumentation-Based Science Learning Approach in Social Studies: Academic Achievement and Students' Views. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 9(1), 209-245. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.529139

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Interview question on favorite activities (Table 14): competing theories (creating arguments easier f=4, reflecting ideas better f=3, commenting better f=2), news (f=3 and f=3), concept cartoons (f=1), from the 10 interviewed students.

"As indicated in Table 14, the students specified that they liked the activities of competing theories, news, and concept cartoons respectively since they could create arguments easier, reflect ideas better, and comment on claims better."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.