Claims

Abuse typology groups differed significantly on overall ADHD symptom scores, with only the non-abused group differing significantly from the three abuse groups in post hoc analysis

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A one-way ANOVA found significant differences between abuse groups on ADHD scores, F(2, 2,939)=40.07, p<0.001; post hoc tests showed only the non-abused group differed significantly from the three abuse groups. → Sanderud K. 2016

Evidence

Sanderud K. 2016

Sanderud K., Murphy S., Elklit A. (2016). Child maltreatment and ADHD symptoms in a sample of young adults. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v7.32061

q3 · i? · associational · r2

One-way ANOVA on abuse typologies and overall ADHD score in the national survey. The overall abuse group scored M=16.87 (SD=4.30), emotional abuse M=16.01, sexual abuse M=15.30, and the non-abused group "much lower levels of ADHD (M=13.81, SD=3.72)"; no effect size is printed.

"Post hoc analysis indicated that only the non-abused group differed significantly from the three abuse groups with much lower levels of ADHD (M=13.81, SD=3.72)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id abuse-groups-differ-adhd-scores-anova
title Abuse typology groups differed significantly on overall ADHD symptom scores, with only the non-abused group differing significantly from the three abuse groups in post hoc analysis
description Abuse typology groups differed significantly on overall ADHD symptom scores, with only the non-abused group differing significantly from the three abuse groups in post hoc analysis
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
recheck_by 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sanderud-k-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.