Claims

Males were significantly more likely than females to report probable ADHD in the young adult sample (OR=1.56)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 In the binary logistic regression, males were significantly more likely than females to report probable ADHD (OR=1.56, CI 1.23–1.96). → Sanderud K. 2016

Evidence

Sanderud K. 2016

Sanderud K., Murphy S., Elklit A. (2016). Child maltreatment and ADHD symptoms in a sample of young adults. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v7.32061

q3 · i1 · associational · r2

Gender effect from the same binary logistic regression model (χ2(4)=82.81, p<0.001) in the Danish national survey; Table 3 prints B=0.44 (SE 0.12), OR=1.56, CI 1.23–1.96, p<0.001 for males versus females.

"Males were significantly more likely than females to report probable ADHD (OR=1.56)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id males-more-likely-probable-adhd
title Males were significantly more likely than females to report probable ADHD in the young adult sample (OR=1.56)
description Males were significantly more likely than females to report probable ADHD in the young adult sample (OR=1.56)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
recheck_by 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sanderud-k-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.