Claims

Neither the workshop nor the one-on-one intervention affected enrollment in the following semester

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Spring 2015 enrollment did not differ significantly across the workshop (77.8%), one-on-one (77.2%), and control (79.8%) groups. → Visher 2016

Evidence

Visher 2016

Visher, M. G., Mayer, A. K., Johns, M., Rudd, T., Levine, A., and Rauner, M. (2016). Scaling academic planning in community college: A randomized controlled trial (REL 2017–204). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Null persistence outcome from the same RCT, measured in 2015 administrative data. Table 2 prints spring 2015 enrollment of 77.8 percent (workshop), 77.2 percent (one-on-one), and 79.8 percent (control), with differences of -2.0, -2.6, and 0.6 percentage points, none significant; equivalence was not tested.

"No enrollment differences between any of the groups were statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.