Claims

Neither strings nor singing workshops separately outperformed drama workshops on maths or literacy attainment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? When the two music arms were analysed separately against the drama control, neither showed evidence of out-performing drama in advancing maths or literacy attainment. → Sarah Haywood 2015

Evidence

Sarah Haywood 2015

Sarah Haywood, Julia Griggs, Cheryl Lloyd, Stephen Morris, Zsolt Kiss, Amy Skipp. (2015). Creative Futures: Act, Sing, Play Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581247

q4 · i? · causal · r3

Separate analysis of the two treatment arms (ASP-strings and ASP-singing) against the ASP-drama control in the three-arm RCT. The report states "neither strings nor singing workshops showed evidence of out-performing drama workshops"; no separate effect sizes are printed in the text provided.

"Each of the two different types of music workshop (strings and singing) was also analysed separately. As was the case with the main analysis, neither strings nor singing workshops showed evidence of out-performing drama workshops in advancing maths or literacy attainment."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.