Acceptability of adaptive learning by all stakeholders was the most frequently mentioned outcome, strongly connected to stakeholder recognition of its advantages¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Acceptability by all stakeholders — the perception that adaptive learning is agreeable, satisfactory, and advantageous compared with traditional online learning models — was the most frequently mentioned factor and identified as the desired intermediate outcome. → Mirata 2023
q2 i? A strong connection, indicated by a high frequency of statements' mentioning, was noted between acceptability and the determinant of recognition of the advantages of adaptive learning. → Mirata 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Mirata 2023¶
Mirata, V., & Bergamin, P. (2023). Role of organisational readiness and stakeholder acceptance: an implementation framework of adaptive learning for higher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10248-7
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Secondary analysis of qualitative Delphi data from both panels; participants stated acceptance as an important challenge, e.g. "Acceptance by lecturers and students must be created" and "Full acceptance by the students [is missing]".
"The most frequently mentioned factor by the experts of both panels was the acceptability of adaptive learning by all stakeholders, that is, their perception that adaptive learning is agreeable, satisfactory, and advantageous in comparison with traditional online learning models, which we identified as the desired intermediate outcome."
Mirata 2023 (2)¶
Mirata, V., & Bergamin, P. (2023). Role of organisational readiness and stakeholder acceptance: an implementation framework of adaptive learning for higher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10248-7
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Qualitative Delphi data; the article reports this finding was relevant for both panels and particularly for the Swiss panel, indicating that lack of stakeholder understanding of benefits influences acceptability.
"The acceptance must be improved through the recognition of the added value [of adaptive learning] by everyone: what is the benefit for me personally?"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student and instructor motivation as an intermediate outcome is influenced by system robustness, learning analytics visualisation, and recognition of adaptive learning's advantages — related
- Instructor motivation to use adaptive learning acts as a facilitator influencing student acceptability of adaptive learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.