Claims

Acceptability of adaptive learning by all stakeholders was the most frequently mentioned outcome, strongly connected to stakeholder recognition of its advantages

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Acceptability by all stakeholders — the perception that adaptive learning is agreeable, satisfactory, and advantageous compared with traditional online learning models — was the most frequently mentioned factor and identified as the desired intermediate outcome. → Mirata 2023 q2 i? A strong connection, indicated by a high frequency of statements' mentioning, was noted between acceptability and the determinant of recognition of the advantages of adaptive learning. → Mirata 2023 (2)

Evidence

Mirata 2023

Mirata, V., & Bergamin, P. (2023). Role of organisational readiness and stakeholder acceptance: an implementation framework of adaptive learning for higher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10248-7

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Secondary analysis of qualitative Delphi data from both panels; participants stated acceptance as an important challenge, e.g. "Acceptance by lecturers and students must be created" and "Full acceptance by the students [is missing]".

"The most frequently mentioned factor by the experts of both panels was the acceptability of adaptive learning by all stakeholders, that is, their perception that adaptive learning is agreeable, satisfactory, and advantageous in comparison with traditional online learning models, which we identified as the desired intermediate outcome."

Mirata 2023 (2)

Mirata, V., & Bergamin, P. (2023). Role of organisational readiness and stakeholder acceptance: an implementation framework of adaptive learning for higher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10248-7

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative Delphi data; the article reports this finding was relevant for both panels and particularly for the Swiss panel, indicating that lack of stakeholder understanding of benefits influences acceptability.

"The acceptance must be improved through the recognition of the added value [of adaptive learning] by everyone: what is the benefit for me personally?"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.