Claims

Comprehension domain: one study found a substantively important positive effect and one an indeterminate effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the comprehension domain, Tracey and Young reported a substantively important positive effect while Hill and Lenard reported an indeterminate effect. → What Works Clearinghouse 2018

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2018

What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Adolescent Literacy intervention report: Achieve3000®. https://whatworks.ed.gov

q3 · i? · review · r3

WWC synthesis of two studies (12,698 students in 36 schools) reporting: Tracey and Young's SRI effect size of 0.29 was substantively important though not statistically significant after clustering correction, and Hill and Lenard's EOG composite effects were indeterminate.

"Thus, for the comprehension domain, one study reported a substantively important positive effect and one study reported an indeterminate effect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id achieve3000-comprehension-mixed-findings
title Comprehension domain: one study found a substantively important positive effect and one an indeterminate effect
description Comprehension domain: one study found a substantively important positive effect and one an indeterminate effect
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.