The acknowledgment rate — how often partners give feedback of having perceived, understood, and accepted contributions — varies according to the medium and the content of interactions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Acknowledgment rate varies according to the media and the content of interactions in multimodal computer-mediated collaboration. → Pierre Dillenbourg 2006

Evidence¶

Pierre Dillenbourg 2006¶

Pierre Dillenbourg, David Traum. (2006). Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multi-modal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (1), pp.121-151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_9

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Exploratory study measuring acknowledgment rate, defined as "how often partners give feedback of having perceived, understood, and accepted partner's contributions", across two media and interaction contents. No effect sizes are printed in the available text.

"A study was done on how the acknowledgment rate (how often partners give feedback of having perceived, understood, and accepted partner's contributions) varies according to the media and the content of interactions."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In multimodal collaboration, the whiteboard primarily represents the state of problem solving while chat grounds whiteboard content, contrary to the expectation that schemata on the whiteboard would disambiguate chat utterances
• More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium: the whiteboard acts as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool
• Written media afford simultaneous production and comprehension, which pairs appropriate to manage multiple discussion threads — related