More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium: the whiteboard acts as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Results are interpreted in terms of persistence, with more persistent information exchanged through the more persistent medium. → Pierre Dillenbourg 2006
q2 i? The whiteboard was used as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool. → Pierre Dillenbourg 2006 (2)
Evidence¶
Pierre Dillenbourg 2006¶
Pierre Dillenbourg, David Traum. (2006). Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multi-modal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (1), pp.121-151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_9
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Authors' interpretation of the exploratory multimodal collaboration study results, offered as a persistence principle: "More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium."
"These results are interpreted in terms of persistence: More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium."
Pierre Dillenbourg 2006 (2)¶
Pierre Dillenbourg, David Traum. (2006). Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multi-modal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (1), pp.121-151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_9
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Concluding statement of the exploratory study of whiteboard and chat collaboration, reporting that "The whiteboard was used as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool."
"The whiteboard was used as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The acknowledgment rate — how often partners give feedback of having perceived, understood, and accepted contributions — varies according to the medium and the content of interactions
- Tabletops tend to be small-group environments, contrasting with personal devices and public whiteboards — related
- Collaborative technologies support learning by enabling learners to share and exchange both ideas and their own digital products — related
- In multimodal collaboration, the whiteboard primarily represents the state of problem solving while chat grounds whiteboard content, contrary to the expectation that schemata on the whiteboard would disambiguate chat utterances — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
persistence-more-persistent-info-more-persistent-medium |
title |
More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium: the whiteboard acts as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool |
description |
More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium: the whiteboard acts as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — pierre-dillenbourg-2006, pierre-dillenbourg-2006-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.