Claims

Pooled analysis finds no significant association between active commuting to school and mathematics performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 In a random-effects pooled analysis of two studies, ACS was not significantly associated with mathematics performance (pooled odds ratio = 1.18; CI = 0.40, 3.48; p = 0.77). → Phansikar 2019

Evidence

Phansikar 2019

Phansikar, M.; Ashrafi, S.A.; Khan, N.A.; Massey, W.V.; Mullen, S.P. (2019). Active Commute in Relation to Cognition and Academic Achievement in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Future Recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245103

q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2

Quantitative analysis (random effects model, Stata 14.2) pooling two of six math-performance studies due to heterogeneity (I2 > 85.00%). The review reports "pooled odds ratio = 1.18; CI = 0.40, 3.48; p = 0.77", a non-significant positive association.

"Compared to those engaging in passive commuting, engaging in ACS was not associated with math performance (pooled odds ratio = 1.18; CI = 0.40, 3.48; p = 0.77)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.