Claims

Active classrooms show no clear effect on executive function or fluid intelligence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pooled effects on executive function are small and negative (SMD = -0.04) with a CI including no effect and possible benefit; fluid intelligence shows close to no effect. → Bedard Chloe 2019

Evidence

Bedard Chloe 2019

Bedard Chloe, St John Laura, Bremer Emily, Graham Jeffrey D., Cairney John. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of physically active classrooms on educational and enjoyment outcomes in school age children. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218633

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of three studies (n = 112) on executive functions (inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory) pooled to SMD = -0.04 (-0.41 to 0.34); two studies of fluid intelligence (n = 61) showed a mean difference of 0.38 (-3.21 to 3.96). No effect sizes beyond these were printed.

"Pooled estimates show small negative effects of active classrooms compared to traditional classrooms on measures of EF (SMD = -0.04), however the CI include no effect and possible benefit. Two other studies used Raven’s Standard Progressive matrices to measure fluid intelligence and found close to no effect of active classrooms"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.