Claims

Effects of active classrooms on academic subjects vary, with language showing a clear increase and math and reading showing small imprecise effects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pooling nine studies shows a small math effect (SMD = 0.08) with a CI including harm and no effect; language (two studies) shows SMD = 1.07 with a CI excluding no effect. → Bedard Chloe 2019

Evidence

Bedard Chloe 2019

Bedard Chloe, St John Laura, Bremer Emily, Graham Jeffrey D., Cairney John. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of physically active classrooms on educational and enjoyment outcomes in school age children. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218633

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Subject-level subgroup analyses (Table 2): math 11 studies, n = 526, SMD = 0.08 (-0.09 to 0.26); reading 6 studies, n = 401, SMD = 0.04 (-0.16 to 0.24); language 2 studies, n = 43, SMD = 1.07 (0.42 to 1.72). Statistical tests of subgroup differences by subject could not be performed.

"Pooling nine studies shows a small increase in math scores of active classrooms (SMD = 0.08) however the 95% CI includes small possible harm and no effect. Pooled effects of six studies show similarly small and imprecise improvement in reading performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.