Claims

Active learning activities produce higher post-test achievement than traditional direct instruction in a fifth-grade English unit

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After four weeks of active learning instruction, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the unit achievement test. → Yenen 2019

Evidence

Yenen 2019

Yenen, E. T., & Dursun, F. (2019). The Effect of Active Learning Approach on Student Achievement in Secondary School 5th Grade English Course. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(2), 175-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/novitas

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental post-test comparison of the experimental group (n=34) and control group (n=31) after four weeks (12 course hours) of instruction. The experimental mean was "X = 85.21" versus "X = 74.81", with t(63) = -3.38, p < .05. No effect size was printed.

"However, in the post -tests there was a significant difference between the average score of the experimental group ( X = 85.21) and the average of the control group ( X = 74.81). This difference was found to be significant with respect to t- test results [t (63) = - 3.38, p <.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.