Claims

Active learning-based education shows a more permanent effect on achievement than traditional methods four weeks after instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? On the delayed permanence test administered four weeks after the post-test, the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group, and its score decline was smaller. → Yenen 2019

Evidence

Yenen 2019

Yenen, E. T., & Dursun, F. (2019). The Effect of Active Learning Approach on Student Achievement in Secondary School 5th Grade English Course. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(2), 175-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/novitas

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Permanence test: the same achievement test was re-administered four weeks after the post-test to both groups. Experimental mean was "X =82.81" and control "X =69.90", t(63) = -4.26, p < .05; declines were 2.70% versus 4.91%. No effect size was printed.

"However, this decrease was 2.70% in the experimental group and 4.91% in the control group. In other words, the difference between the achievement test scores between the experimental ( X =82.81) and control ( X =69.90) group was further increased. This difference was also significant with respect to t -test results [t (63) = - 4.26, p <.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.