Technology-enhanced adaptive teaching improves delayed but not immediate learning outcomes compared with business-as-usual teaching¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Students in technology-enhanced adaptive teaching units significantly outperformed control students on the four-week delayed posttest (β = 0.27, small effect), while the immediate posttest difference was not significant. → Sibley 2025
Evidence¶
Sibley 2025¶
Sibley, L., Fabian, A., Plicht, C., Pagano, L., Ehrhardt, N., Wellert, L., Bohl, T., & Lachner, A. (2025). Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102141
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental pre-post-delayed-test study with parallel classes as controls (N = 656, k = 12 units), cluster-robust fixed-effect models. The delayed benefit was "significant in the four-week delayed test (β = 0.27, p = .003, small effect)"; the immediate difference was not significant.
"this effect, however, was not significant (β = 0.16, p = .069). Interestingly, the effect was significant in the four-week delayed test (β = 0.27, p = .003, small effect)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Degree of adaptivity moderates the adaptive teaching effect: only highly adaptive units outperform control, and boost self-efficacy — related
- Subject domain moderates the adaptive teaching effect: benefits in languages, none in STEM or humanities — related
- In Study 1, university students using ChatTutor scored significantly higher than teaching-as-usual students on a delayed conceptual knowledge test four weeks after the lesson, but did not differ significantly from ChatGPT students — related
- In Study 1, the three conditions did not differ significantly on the immediate post-test of conceptual knowledge — related
- Technology-enhanced adaptive teaching shows no significant effects on monitoring accuracy, subject-specific interest, or self-efficacy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
adaptive-teaching-delayed-learning-benefit |
title |
Technology-enhanced adaptive teaching improves delayed but not immediate learning outcomes compared with business-as-usual teaching |
description |
Technology-enhanced adaptive teaching improves delayed but not immediate learning outcomes compared with business-as-usual teaching |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sibley-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.