Degree of adaptivity moderates the adaptive teaching effect: only highly adaptive units outperform control, and boost self-efficacy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Units with more than 18 adaptive elements significantly outperformed control at both posttests (β = 0.37 immediate; β = 0.44 delayed), while low-adaptivity units showed no differences. → Sibley 2025
q3 i2 Students in highly adaptive units showed higher self-efficacy in using technology than control students at immediate posttest (β = 0.34). → Sibley 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Sibley 2025¶
Sibley, L., Fabian, A., Plicht, C., Pagano, L., Ehrhardt, N., Wellert, L., Bohl, T., & Lachner, A. (2025). Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102141
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Subsample analyses split at the mean degree of adaptivity (M = 18.06) in the same study. Low-adaptivity units showed no differences (immediate β = 0.21, p = .120; delayed β = 0.15, p = .286).
"teaching units with high degree of adaptivity demonstrated a significant benefit regarding students' learning compared to the control condition (immediate posttest: β = 0.37, p = .004, small effect; delayed posttest: β = 0.44, p = .001, small effect)."
Sibley 2025 (2)¶
Sibley, L., Fabian, A., Plicht, C., Pagano, L., Ehrhardt, N., Wellert, L., Bohl, T., & Lachner, A. (2025). Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102141
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Additional moderation analysis in the same study; the self-efficacy benefit appeared only in the immediate posttest subsample of highly adaptive units.
"Students in highly adaptive technology-enhanced teaching units showed higher self-efficacy compared to students in the control condition in the immediate posttest (β = 0.34, p = .014, small effect)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Technology-enhanced adaptive teaching improves delayed but not immediate learning outcomes compared with business-as-usual teaching — related
- Technology-enhanced adaptive teaching shows no significant effects on monitoring accuracy, subject-specific interest, or self-efficacy — reports the opposite
- Subject domain moderates the adaptive teaching effect: benefits in languages, none in STEM or humanities — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
degree-of-adaptivity-moderates-adaptive-teaching-effect |
title |
Degree of adaptivity moderates the adaptive teaching effect: only highly adaptive units outperform control, and boost self-efficacy |
description |
Degree of adaptivity moderates the adaptive teaching effect: only highly adaptive units outperform control, and boost self-efficacy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — sibley-2025, sibley-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.