Claims

A computer program based on the ADDIE model produced significantly higher reading comprehension post-test scores than traditional teaching among Jordanian ninth graders

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Ninth graders taught with the ADDIE-based computer program scored significantly higher on the reading comprehension post-test than the traditionally taught control group (ANCOVA F = 135.964, Sig. .000). → Talal Alodwan & Mosaab Almosa 2018

Evidence

Talal Alodwan & Mosaab Almosa 2018

Talal Alodwan & Mosaab Almosa. (2018). The Effect of a Computer Program Based on Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE) in Improving Ninth Graders' Listening and Reading Comprehension Skills in English in Jordan. English Language Teaching, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p43

q2 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANCOVA on the 40-item reading comprehension test with pre-test as covariate, in the same non-equivalent groups pre-post design, gave F = 135.964, Sig. .000 for the Group factor. Discussion reports means of 22.86 for the experimental group and 13.03 for the control group.

"Table 2 showed that there are sta tistically significant differences ( = 0.05) in the post test due to independent variable which is computerized method based on ADDIE Model in favor of Experimental group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.