Claims

ADI-based laboratory instruction improves academic achievement in geometrical optics more than traditional laboratory instruction for pre-service science teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 After controlling for pretest scores, the ADI group's corrected OAT post-test mean was significantly higher than the control group's, with a large effect size of ŋ 2 = .26. → Tuba Demircioglu 2015

Evidence

Tuba Demircioglu 2015

Tuba Demircioglu, Sedat Ucar. (2015). Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups study of 79 pre-service science teachers (ADI n=41, traditional n=38). ANCOVA on Optical Achievement Test post-test scores corrected for pretest showed a significant difference in favor of the ADI group with printed effect size ŋ 2 = .26, which the article calls a large effect describing 26% of the variance.

"According to the ANCOV A results, when the OAT pretest scores of the experimental and control groups were analyzed, a significant difference between their corrected post-test scores (F (1-76) = 26.33, p = .00) was found. The effect size of the applied method is ŋ 2 = .26"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.