Inquiry-based instruction significantly improved pre-service science teachers' scientific process skills from pretest to post-test in a university biology laboratory¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's Scientific Process Skills Test scores improved significantly from pretest to post-test after inquiry-based instruction (p=.002). → Ceylan ŞEN 2016
Evidence¶
Ceylan ŞEN 2016¶
Ceylan ŞEN, Gülşah SEZEN VEKLİ. (2016). The Impact of Inquiry Based Instruction on Science Process Skills and Self-efficacy Perceptions of Pre-service Science Teachers at a University Level Biology Laboratory. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(3): 603-612. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040319
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test on the experimental group's (n=12) SPST pretest-posttest scores in the 14-week quasi-experiment; all 12 participants showed positive ranks, Z=-3.066, p=.002, favoring the post-test.
"It is seen in Table 3 that there are significant differences between pretest and post-test scores of the preservice science teachers in the experimental group and this difference is in favor of the post-test scores (p= .002< .05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both experimental and control groups improved their proportional reasoning scores from pretest to posttest — related
- The control group taught with the traditional approach also improved significantly on scientific process skills from pretest to post-test — related
- The inquiry-based instruction group scored significantly higher than the traditional-approach group on the post-test of scientific process skills — related
- Inquiry-based instruction significantly improved pre-service science teachers' laboratory usage self-efficacy perceptions from pretest to post-test — related
- Pre-service science teachers in the inquiry group reported both positive experiences (permanent learning, active research, cooperation) and difficulties (time demands, unreliable resources) — related
- Interviewed ADI students reported engaging in scientific practices such as identifying variables, finding patterns in data, and developing methods, while no comparison-group students did — related
- Only the designing-experiments inquiry skill improved significantly, and its gain correlates with the highest frequency of FACT use — related
- Teaching with FACTs produces significantly better inquiry-skill post-test results than teacher-centred teaching without FACTs in upper-secondary science — related
- ADI-based laboratory instruction improves academic achievement in geometrical optics more than traditional laboratory instruction for pre-service science teachers — related
- Students taught college algebra via the scientific heuristic method performed significantly better on the post-test than students taught by direct instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.