Claims

Adjusted posttest VST means were ordered by time spent using the word card program, with the two-hour group highest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Adjusted posttest means rose with word-card program time: control M = 2719.00, vocabulary and ER M = 3680.00, vocabulary M = 4092.00. → McLean 2013

Evidence

McLean 2013

McLean, S., Hogg, N., & Rush, T. W. (2013). Vocabulary learning through an online computerized flashcard site. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(1), 79-98. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1108008

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA adjusted posttest means from the same 12-class quasi-experiment, reported in Table 5 with 95% confidence intervals. The article reports the means were "in the order of the time spent using the word card program"; no standardized effect size is printed for this ordering.

"The means of the posttest VST score adjusted for initial differences were in the order of the time spent using the word card program (Table 5). The control group had the smallest adjusted mean (M = 2719.00), vocabulary and ER group had a larger adjusted mean (M = 3680.00), and the vocabulary group had the largest adjusted mean (M = 4092.00)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.