Longer time spent in the Parole software correlates with more words learned and retained¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Time spent in the software strongly correlates with words learned (r = .80) and words remembered (r = .79). → Yelbay Yılmaz 2015
Evidence¶
Yelbay Yılmaz 2015¶
Yelbay Yılmaz, Y. (2015). Learning vocabulary in a foreign language: A computer software based model attempt. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 23-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105162
q3 · i3 · causal · r1
Correlational analysis of the 36 experimental group students' software usage logs against post-test scores found "r = .80 (p<0.001)" for learning; a parallel analysis of delayed post-test scores found r = .79 (p<0.001) for retention.
"The result r = .80 (p<0.001) shows a strong positive correlation. It can be concluded that the lo nger students use the software the more words they can learn."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students using the Parole vocabulary software learned more words than control students over eight weeks — related
- Parole users retained more vocabulary twelve weeks after instruction than control students — related
- Students report that Parole makes vocabulary learning permanent but time-consuming — related
- Adjusted posttest VST means were ordered by time spent using the word card program, with the two-hour group highest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.